|
Click on ballot measure for more detail.
- Measure H.
Sales and Use Tax
-- City of Chico
(Majority Approval Required)
 Pass:
17320 /
52.72% Yes votes ......
15530 /
47.28% No votes
- To support vital city services including: maintaining/repairing streets, storm drains, sidewalks, and fixing potholes; addressing homelessness; protecting 911 emergency response times; preserving the number of on-duty police officers and fire fighters; maintaining/improving Bidwell Park, neighborhood parks, and funding other general services and essential activity; shall an ordinance establishing a 1 percent sales tax, providing approximately $24,000,000 annually until ended by voters, subject to annual audits, with all funds staying local, be adopted?
- Measure J.
School Bond
-- Gridley Unified School District
(55% Approval Required)
Pass:
1922 /
60.19% Yes votes ......
1271 /
39.81% No votes
- To improve educational facilities at Gridley High School; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace outdated heating, ventilation and cooling systems; shall the Gridley Unified School District measure authorizing $16,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 4 cents per $100 assessed value, generating on average $870,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and no money taken by the State?
- Measure K.
Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program
-- County of Butte
(2/3 Approval Required)
Pass:
49121 /
71.25% Yes votes ......
19822 /
28.75% No votes
- Should the Butte County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional three dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?
- Measure L.
Public Nuisance Law
-- City of Chico
(Majority Approval Required)
Pass:
18934 /
60.08% Yes votes ......
12582 /
39.92% No votes
- Shall an ordinance which requires the City of Chico be held to abide by the same public nuisance laws it imposes on private landowners by establishing a right for residents uniquely harmed by a public nuisance to demand the abatement of public nuisances by the City on City-owned public property; and requires the City to respond to the demand by abating the alleged nuisance or providing the reason for its refusal, limited to prescribed justifications, be adopted?
|
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
