This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sac/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
Sacramento County, CA November 3, 2020 Election
Directory of Sacramento County, CA Measures
County Results as of Dec 1 8:32am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (677/677)
82.5% Countywide Voter Turnout (729,569/884,247)

Measures
Click on ballot measure for more detail.

Measure A. Mayoral Accountability -- City of Sacramento (Majority Approval Required)
Fail: 89,233 / 42.66% Yes votes ...... 119,950 / 57.34% No votes
Shall the measure known as the `Sacramento Mayoral Accountability and Community Equity Act' + which amends the City of Sacramento charter to establish a mayor-council form of government; establish participatory budgeting for citizens' direct input; require analysis of impacts of certain council decisions on racial, ethnic, LGBTQ, and gender groups; require a specified portion of the budget be invested in inclusive economic development and youth services; makes permanent the city's ethics commission; and make other changes + be adopted?

Measure B. Amending City Charter -- City of Sacramento (Majority Approval Required)
Pass: 132,464 / 66.62% Yes votes ...... 66,375 / 33.38% No votes
Shall the measure amending section 171 of the City of Sacramento Charter, to have the Sacramento Independent Redistricting Commission establish the next council district boundaries map no later than 130 days before the 2022 primary city election so that the map could be used for the 2022 elections, be adopted?​

Measure C. Charter Amendment -- City of Sacramento (Majority Approval Required)
Fail: 82,370 / 39.61% Yes votes ...... 125,602 / 60.39% No votes
Shall the measure adding an article to the City of Sacramento Charter to (i) create a new elected body (Rental Housing Board) with powers that include setting rents, establishing regulations, establishing its own budget, charging fees to finance its operations, establishing penalties, conducting investigations, and adjudicating rent adjustments; (ii) set a base rent for all covered rental units within the city and cap annual rent increases; and (iii) limit landlords' ability to terminate tenancies, be adopted?​

Measure J. Bond Measure -- River Delta School Facility Improvement District 1 (55% Approval Required)
Pass: 799 / 66.03% Yes votes ...... 411 / 33.97% No votes
To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; building science labs; updating aging technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $45,700,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6¢/$100 of assessed value, averaging $2,600,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens' oversight/ all funds used locally, be adopted?

Measure K. Bond Measure -- River Delta School Facility Improvement District 2 (55% Approval Required)
Pass: 757 / 64.87% Yes votes ...... 410 / 35.13% No votes
To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; keeping schools safe; updating technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/jobs/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $14,600,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6¢/$100 of assessed value, averaging $845,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens' oversight/all funds used locally, be adopted?

Measure L. Transactions and Use Tax -- City of Isleton (Majority Approval Required)
Pass: 202 / 66.67% Yes votes ...... 101 / 33.33% No votes
Shall the measure to support the continued operation of the City of Isleton's general services, including police, fire, parks, and other unrestricted general fund expenditures, by enacting a one-half (½) percent transactions and use tax for a period of five (5) years commencing on April 1, 2022, that is projected to provide between $83,726.06 and $106,858.02 of revenue annually, be adopted?

Measure M. Transactions Sales and Use Tax -- City of Citrus Heights (Majority Approval Required)
Fail: 19,159 / 47.55% Yes votes ...... 21,136 / 52.45% No votes
To protect local control with funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain 911 emergency response times; crime investigation/prevention; well-trained community police officers; school safety/security; pothole/street repair; homelessness reduction programs; local business/jobs support; and other city services, shall a measure to establish a Citrus Heights 1¢ sales tax generating $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, with independent annual audits and citizen oversight, and all funds spent in Citrus Heights?​

Measure R. Tansaction Use Tax -- City of Rancho Cordova (Majority Approval Required)
Pass: 16,979 / 52.76% Yes votes ...... 15,205 / 47.24% No votes
To support City ​of Rancho Cordova through relief/recovery including: repairing streets/potholes; keeping public areas healthy, clean/safe; maintaining neighborhood public safety; supporting/attracting new and local businesses/jobs; preparing for any natural disaster/health emergency; addressing homelessness; other general city services; shall the Rancho Cordova measure be adopted levying a ½¢ sales tax, until ended by voters, raising $8,000,000 annually, with yearly audits, citizen oversight, local control/investment during uncertain times, no money for administrator salaries?

 
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.


Sacramento Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: April 1, 2022 11:30 PDT
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.