This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/state/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
State of California November 6, 2012 Election
Proposition 40
Redistricting. State Senate Districts
State of California

Referendum - Majority Approval Required

Pass: 8,235,698 / 71.9% Yes votes ...... 3,215,335 / 28.1% No votes

See Also: Index of all Propositions

Results as of Dec 3 10:07pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (24491/24491)
Information shown below: Summary | Fiscal Impact | Yes/No Meaning | Official Information | Arguments |

Should the current state Senate districts be retained?

Summary Prepared by the State Attorney General:

  • A "Yes" vote approves, and a "No" vote rejects, new State Senate districts drawn by the Citizens Redistricting Commission.
  • If the new districts are rejected, the State Senate district boundary lines will be adjusted by officials supervised by the California Supreme Court.
  • State Senate districts are revised every 10 years following the federal census.

Fiscal Impact from the Legislative Analyst's Office:

  • If the voters vote "yes" and approve the state Senate district maps certified by the Citizens Redistricting Commission, there would be no fiscal effect on state or local governments.
  • If the voters vote "no" and reject the state Senate district maps certified by the Citizens Redistricting Commission, the state would incur a one-time cost of about $500,000 to establish new Senate districts. Counties would incur one-time costs of about $500,000 statewide to develop new precinct maps and related election materials for the new districts.

Meaning of Voting Yes/No
A YES vote on this measure means:
The state Senate district boundaries certified by the Citizens Redistricting Commission would continue to be used.

A NO vote on this measure means:
The California Supreme Court would appoint special masters to determine new state Senate district boundaries.

Official Sources of Information
Arguments Submitted to the Secretary of State

Summary of Arguments FOR Proposition 40:
Yes on 40 protects the State Senate maps drawn by the voter-approved Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission. Yes on 40 upholds the will of California voters to hold politicians accountable by keeping them out of the redistricting process. Good government groups, seniors, businesses and taxpayers recommend "Yes on 40."

Summary of Arguments AGAINST Proposition 40:
As sponsors of Proposition 40, our intention was to overturn the commission's State Senate districts for 2012. However, due to the State Supreme Court's ruling that kept these districts in place for 2012, we have suspended our campaign and no longer seek a NO vote.
Contact FOR Proposition 40:
Yes on 40 Hold Politicians Accountable
1215 K Street, Suite 2260
Sacramento, CA 95814
(866) 408-4527
Info@HoldPoliticiansAccountable.org
http://www.HoldPoliticiansAccountable.org

  Official Information

Secretary of State

Campaign Finance Data

Who contributes? What is spent?

Nonpartisan Information

League of Women Voters of California Education Fund

CaliforniaChoices.org Events

Pros & Cons Meetings

  • Many Leagues hold public meetings on the state propositions. Enter only your zip code into our lookup to find a meeting in your area.
News and Analysis

Google Search

  • About this proposition - Note: This link to an external resource is offered strictly as a convenience for users interested in coverage by outside news organizations. The content is provided by organizations unaffiliated with Smart Voter and its partners, and no endorsement of any views expressed or guarantee of its accuracy is intended or implied.
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Proposition 40 Arguments Against Proposition 40

YES ON 40 PROTECTS THE VOTER-APPROVED INDEPENDENT CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

A YES vote on Prop. 40 means that the State Senate maps drawn by the voter-approved independent Citizens Redistricting Commission will remain in place.

A NO vote on Prop. 40 gives the politicians an opportunity to overturn the fair districts drawn by the independent Commission—costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars in the process.

PROP. 40 IS A SIMPLE CHOICE BETWEEN THE VOTER-APPROVED CITIZENS COMMISSION AND SELF-INTERESTED POLITICIANS

In 2008, California voters approved Proposition 11, which created the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission to draw the district maps for the State Senate and State Assembly. Before Prop. 11, the politicians in the state Legislature drew their own uncompetitive districts, virtually guaranteeing themselves re-election.

Now, a small group of Sacramento politicians is unhappy with the results of the State Senate maps drawn by the independent Commission. These politicians are using this referendum to try to get their uncompetitive districts back.

THE POLITICIANS HAVE ALREADY FAILED IN COURT

When the same politicians tried a lawsuit against the State Senate maps, the California Supreme Court ruled unanimously against them:

“. . . not only do the Commission-certified Senate districts appear to comply with all of the constitutionally mandated criteria set forth in California Constitution, article XXI, the Commission-certified Senate districts also are a product of what generally appears to have been an open, transparent and nonpartisan redistricting process as called for by the current provisions of article XXI.” Vandermost v. Bowen (2012)

We welcome you to read the whole ruling: www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S198387.PDF

YES ON PROPOSITION 40 UPHOLDS THE WILL OF CALIFORNIA VOTERS

California voters have voted three times in the last four years to have district maps drawn by an independent Commission, not the politicians:

  • Yes on Proposition 11 (2008): created the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission to draw the maps for the State Assembly and State Senate
  • Yes on Proposition 20 (2010): extended Prop. 11’s reforms to California’s Congressional districts
  • No on Proposition 27 (2010): rejected politicians’ attempt to eliminate the independent Commission and give the power to draw their own legislative districts back to the politicians

YES ON PROPOSITION 40—HOLDS POLITICIANS ACCOUNTABLE

The passage of Proposition 11 and Proposition 20 and the defeat of Proposition 27 created a fair redistricting process that doesn’t involve Sacramento politicians!

Because of these voter-approved reforms, for the first time in decades, the independent Commission drew fair districts for state legislators and Congress, starting with the 2012 elections.

These redistricting reforms have put an end to political backroom deals by ensuring the process is transparent and open to the public. And, politicians are no longer guaranteed re-election, but are held accountable to voters and have to respond to constituent needs.

“The Commission took politicians out of the process and returned power to the voters.”—John Kabateck, Executive Director, National Federation of Independent Business/California

VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 40—STOP POLITICIANS FROM OVERTURNING VOTER-APPROVED ELECTION REFORM

http://www.HoldPoliticiansAccountable.org

JENNIFER A. WAGGONER, President
League of Women Voters of California

DAVID PACHECO, President
AARP California

ALLAN ZAREMBERG, President
California Chamber of Commerce

Rebuttal to Arguments For

As sponsors of Proposition 40, our intention was to overturn the commission’s State Senate districts for 2012. However, due to the State Supreme Court’s ruling that kept these districts in place for 2012, we have suspended our campaign and no longer seek a NO vote.

JULIE VANDERMOST, Sponsor
Proposition 40

As the Official Sponsor of Proposition 40, our intention was to make sure its qualification for the ballot would stop the current Senate District lines from being implemented in 2012. The Supreme Court reviewed the process and intervened to keep district lines in place. With the court’s action, this measure is not needed and we are no longer asking for a NO vote.

JULIE VANDERMOST, Sponsor
Proposition 40

Rebuttal to Arguments Against

A YES VOTE ON PROP. 40 IS STILL NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE VOTER-APPROVED INDEPENDENT CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

Voters still need to vote YES on PROP. 40 to ensure the State Senate maps drawn by the voter-approved independent Citizens Redistricting Commission will remain in place—even though the sponsors of this referendum have indicated above that they are no longer asking for a “No” vote.

Once a referendum qualifies for the ballot, it is impossible to remove it—even if backers abandon the measure, as they did above.

PROP. 40 IS A SIMPLE CHOICE BETWEEN A COSTLY ALTERNATIVE PROCESS AND PROTECTING THE VOTER-APPROVED CITIZENS COMMISSION

Voting YES on 40:

  • PROTECTS THE STATE SENATE MAPS drawn by the voter-approved independent Citizens Redistricting Commission.
  • SAVES TAXPAYERS hundreds of thousands of dollars.
  • HOLDS POLITICIANS ACCOUNTABLE: With district lines drawn by an independent citizens commission, politicians are no longer guaranteed re-election, but are held accountable to voters and have to respond to constituent needs.
  • UPHOLDS THE WILL OF VOTERS: Californians have voted three times in the last four years to have an independent commission draw district maps—NOT the politicians.

A “No” vote on Prop. 40 would overturn the fair districts drawn by the independent Commission—and allow the politicians a chance to once again influence the redistricting process for their own gain.

YES ON PROP. 40

Please join us and a broad coalition of good government, business, senior advocacy and civil rights groups in voting YES on Prop. 40.

http://www.HoldPoliticiansAccountable.org

KATHAY FENG, Executive Director
California Common Cause

JOHN KABATECK, Executive Director
National Federation of Independent     Business/California

GARY TOEBBEN, President
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce


California Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: December 17, 2012 13:48 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.