Candidates
(Vote for 1)
Click on highlighted
name for additional information supplied by candidate.
Contact non-highlighted candidates and encourage them to provide information for
voters.
Thomas C. Fellenz
2,807 votes
45.25%
- Occupation: Civil Engineer/Attorney
- Deputy Chief Counsel-Department of Transportation
- B.S Civil Engineering
- JD Law
Priorities:
- Asset management of District infrastructure
- Keep user rates low
- Water conservation
Jim Russell
1,776 votes
28.63%
- Occupation: Logistics Planner
- MBA from UC Davis in Operations & Production Mngt
- Six yrs purchasing experience in water delivery & wastewater treatment
Priorities:
- District water conservation
- measured rate increases to maintain infrastructure
- reach equilibrium where rates cover distribution/capital improvements
Leroy Munsch
1,596 votes
25.73%
- Occupation: Community Volunteer
- Management Consultant with the California Department of Educaction for 30 years
- Board Member for 20 years with the Fulton El Camino Recreation and Park District
- Selected as outstanding Board Member by California Association of Recreation and Park Districts
- Masters Degree in Public Administration
- Played a key role in changing the former water district board and administration
Priorities:
- I am committed to gaining cost containment of employee retirement and medical benefits.
- I am committed to accelerating the capital improvement program. It is more cost effective to get this program done now rather than later.
- I am committed to revising the district's priorities in replacing existing water lines giving consideration to public safety.
Basic candidate data supplied by the applicable elections official.
All candidates have been invited to supply additional information to Smart Voter.
Order of candidates is random and changes daily.
|
|
|
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
