League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
| ||||
 |
|
|||
|
Measure G Initiative Measure Adopting A General Plan For The County Of El Dorado El Dorado County Majority Approval Required 13434 / 29.9% Yes votes ...... 31493 / 70.0% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||
| ||||
| Results as of Mar 3 0:18am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (117/117) |
| Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments | Full Text | ||||
|
Shall Measure G be approved, adopting the general plan proposed in the Measure as the official General Plan for the County of El Dorado, and specifying those aspects of the General Plan that can be amended by the Board of Supervisors without voter approval?
Every county must adopt a general plan, which is a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of the county. It must contain seven mandatory elements: land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open-space, noise and safety, and may contain optional elements. Subordinate land use actions like zoning and discretionary project approvals must be consistent with the general plan. Any general plan adopted will broadly affect all aspects of development in the County. State law prescribes substantive and procedural requirements to be followed before the Board of Supervisors can adopt a general plan. Environmental review must be conducted under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and noticed public hearings held before the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors before the Board acts. El Dorado County adopted a General Plan in 1996. In 1999, that General Plan was set aside because of a court ruling that the County had not complied fully with CEQA. El Dorado County is now preparing a new general plan and conducting the environmental review. A draft environmental impact report ("EIR") was issued by the County in May, 2003. It analyzes four alternatives in depth. Public comment has been received and County responses are being prepared. This CEQA process must be completed before the Board can adopt a new general plan. Measure G would supersede the County's pending readoption proceedings, since voter sponsored initiatives are exempt from CEQA and other hearing requirements. The Measure G Plan is based on, but is not identical to, the alternative entitled "the 1996 General Plan Alternative" analyzed in the EIR. One difference is that the Measure G Plan omits policies contained in the 1996 General Plan Alternative that require the provision of affordable housing in connection with residential development projects. The 1996 General Plan Alternative reflects the General Plan adopted in 1996, as amended through February 4, 1999, so that both it and the Measure G Plan contain the policies added to the General Plan by Measure Y, an initiative approved by the voters in 1998. The effects of the Measure G Plan, and how these effects differ from those of other alternatives, cannot be described within the limits of this impartial analysis. Although the EIR does not address the Measure G Plan, the effects of that plan can be expected to be substantially similar to those of the 1996 General Plan Alternative studied in the EIR. Interested persons can view or obtain copies of the draft EIR at the County Planning Department, at County Libraries, or on the County's website. Measure G provides that the Board may amend the land use map of the general plan (which assigns land use designations to specific property) without voter approval provided the amendments are consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan. The Board may amend the Housing Element to comply with law. All other amendments would require voter approval. A "yes" vote is a vote to approve the measure. A "no" vote is a vote against approving the measure. Louis B. Green County Counsel
|
General Links
| |||
| Arguments For Measure G | Arguments Against Measure G | ||
| We urge your support of Measure G to enact a General Plan for El Dorado County. Lawsuits and backroom deals have prevented implementation of a General Plan and it's now costing taxpayers $1.5 million annually.
Currently there's no accountability for the planning process. Large out-of-area corporations benefit while locals cannot split their land for their children. Millions of dollars are being diverted to outside attorneys and consultants who never produce a workable final product. Vitally important local water rights contracts cannot be completed and government road funds cannot be obtained without a valid General Plan, and no end is in sight. With a voter-approved General Plan:
The constant battles between developers and environmental extremists have hurt our county's ability to make long-range planning decisions, yet California law requires that counties have a General Plan. El Dorado County is in violation of this law that was designed to protect local citizens. Measure G, the EDC General Plan Implementation Act, will enact a General Plan for El Dorado County. Take back local control + vote "YES" on Measure G. s/John Upton Former El Dorado County Supervisor, District 5 s/Wendell E. Smith President, El Dorado County Chamber of Commerce s/Doug Leisz Agriculturist & Professional Forester s/Ellen Day President, El Dorado County Taxpayers Association s/Richard W. Russell Business Owner & Consulting Scientist
Measure G is an attempt by a small group of developers to hijack the County's General Plan adoption process to guarantee they can get their projects approved. Our Board of Supervisors is only 6 months away from adopting a new General Plan after spending three years and a lot of money. Measure G contains serious flaws:
EXAMPLE: Developers say Measure G protects agriculture. NOT TRUE. The other General Plan alternatives protect agriculture. Measure G allows thousands of acres of farmlands to be subdivided on behalf of Measure G's campaign contributors. EXAMPLE: Developers say Measure G "brings accountability to the planning process". Hardly. Measure G was written by a San Francisco attorney. The only "input" came from his developer clients. And there won't be any public input in the future because Measure G goes on forever and not one word can be changed without a county-wide vote. Measure G is the WRONG way to adopt a BAD General Plan. s/Kathi Lishman Mayor, City of Placerville s/Charlie Paine El Dorado County Supervisor, District Four s/Sam Bradley Measure Y Committee/Former El Dorado County Supervisor s/Carol Patton Businesswoman/Planning Commissioner s/Lorraine Larsen-Hallock El Dorado County Planning Commissioner | Measure G is a bad way to adopt a General Plan.
Measure G, if adopted:
In 1999, the 1996 General Plan was judged illegal. New subdivisions were prohibited until adoption of a new General Plan and Environmental Impact Report. Today El Dorado County is 6 months away from adopting a new General Plan. Last summer, four alternatives were released. One alternative is the old 1996 General Plan (Measure G). It allows the most development, results in the most traffic, and is the most expensive plan to provide service for. It is so out of balance that the Board of Supervisors indicated they would be unlikely to adopt it. Two months later, a small group of developers filed the Measure G initiative. If passed, Measure G stops consideration of all other alternatives and immediately adopts the previously rejected 1996 General Plan. Don't vote for the 1996 General Plan which:
Please vote NO on Measure G. s/Charlie Paine El Dorado County Supervisor, District Four s/Kathi Lishman Mayor, City of Placerville s/Regan K. Asher, MD Environmental Planning and Information Council (EPIC) s/Bill Center Whitewater Rafting Association/Former El Dorado County Supervisor s/Sam Bradley Measure Y Committee/Former El Dorado County Supervisor
Traffic on local roads and Hwy 50 gridlock is worsening without a General Plan. Measure G prevents further gridlock by enacting Measure Y + requiring developers to pay the full cost of road impacts they cause. Measure G helps protect local farmers and ranchers whose needs are being ignored. Measure G is necessary because Supervisors aren't willing to adopt a General Plan, but keep funding studies while growth continues. Property owners, farmers, businesses and commuters are supporting Measure G because they originally had input into its General Plan process. Measure G offers solutions, not obstructions, and takes the politics out of planning. Vote Yes on Measure G. s/Wendell E. Smith President, El Dorado County Chamber of Commerce s/Doug Leisz Agriculturist & Professional Forester s/Joann Shepherd Director, Georgetown Divide Public Utilities District s/Jack Steele President, Cameron Park/Shingle Springs Chamber of Commerce s/Michelle Van Horn Past President, El Dorado Hills Chamber of Commerce |
| Full Text of Measure G |
| If approved, this initiative measure would adopt a general plan for the County of El Dorado. The proposed general plan that would be adopted is contained in the initiative petition. It is based on, but is not identical to, a proposed general plan alternative entitled the "1996 General Plan Alternative" which is described and discussed, along with other alternatives, in a draft environmental impact report issued by El Dorado County in May, 2003, (State Clearinghouse No. 2001082030), in connection with the preparation of a new general plan. Every county is required to adopt a general plan, which is a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of the county. A general plan addresses all aspects of development. It must contain seven mandatory elements (two of more of which may be combined in a single element) and may contain any optional element that the county chooses to adopt. The mandatory elements are: land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open-space, noise and safety. Subordinate land use actions, such as zoning ordinances, tentative maps, or development agreements, must be consistent with the general plan. El Dorado County is now in the process of preparing a general plan and conducting the necessary environmental review to allow the Board of Supervisors to consider adoption of a new general plan as a result of a 1999 court decision which held that the County had not complied in all respects with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in adopting a general plan in 1996. State law prescribes the procedures that must be followed before adoption by the Board of Supervisors. Environmental review of the proposed general plan must be conducted under CEQA. Other general requirements include noticed public hearings before the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, and a recommendation by the Planning Commission. Initiative measures submitted to the voters by petition, in contrast, do not require compliance with CEQA or other procedural requirements applicable to adoption of a general plan by the Board of Supervisors. The initiative measure, if approved, provides that the Board of Supervisors may amend (1) the land use designations of properties in a manner consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan adopted by the initiative, and (2) the Housing Element as may be required either through consultation with the state Department of Housing and Community Development or state law. All other amendments to the general plan adopted by the initiative would require voter approval. The initiative contains no expiration date so that the general plan adopted by the initiative would remain in effect indefinitely unless repealed by the voters.
August, 2003 General Plan Initiative Edits to April 2003 Version Entire Document
|
El Dorado Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: May 4, 2004 14:40 PDT
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund http://ca.lwv.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.